{"release":{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic-release/1.0","releaseId":"epirelease_1a173338590c49d480e27b172dd8e381","releaseKind":"initial","status":"active","recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","domainSlug":"quantum-systems","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/quantum-systems/methods/interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","canonicalVersion":"1.0.0","supersedesReleaseId":null,"approvals":[{"scope":"boundary-adequacy","reviewId":"epireview_2a8239cf2db84621a20999b1d7febac9","reviewSha256":"sha256:a966bf8bc15f2d989b58f1eb1bdce64d6d2c0a274084e4824eb39968727b99cf","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.426Z","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest."},{"scope":"domain-fidelity","reviewId":"epireview_03551f0dd2f545ada4c3d025b5809c11","reviewSha256":"sha256:c7b3c4a93fa78a84a3fafda169679b93d85a58b79f5b5c57f8c2da61197d8a38","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.325Z","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest."},{"scope":"rights-and-locator","reviewId":"epireview_659a52e31c5944578dc2ce757b6c17d3","reviewSha256":"sha256:7a1e02e9c8e3b550dbe44f5e3e42db6562c294049c694556b1147a2e33626771","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.529Z","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest."},{"scope":"source-fidelity","reviewId":"epireview_974669c5968e429bbec372f1152ba5fb","reviewSha256":"sha256:e15cfad92305852835be46eb73f2eff06825ef07bf37b674cd6fa427575a64e1","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.229Z","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest."}],"assuranceTier":"internally-reviewed-canonical","releaseAuthority":{"authoritySha256":"sha256:2a0161a3927ae8366af44bda6671b5249802843ff3895dc292c90e5466b88609","attribution":"withheld-by-consent"},"publicChangeSummary":"Initial canonical publication under the disclosed exact-revision internal editorial tier.","recordSha256":"sha256:7531a2a7479af7f9cf1061dc7e476308a1a0bfbd98dee9d3a15d3e62a4e156c2","gateDecision":{"reasons":[],"recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0"},"releasedAt":"2026-08-30T16:02:22.708Z","releaseSha256":"sha256:f72733abaae2f841ef9af4c6073115135f3df3f6b4078625ca139131f1c9369c","withdrawal":null},"provenance":{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic/1.0","evidencePolicyVersion":"mps/0.1","recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/quantum-systems/methods/interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","contentHash":"sha256:7531a2a7479af7f9cf1061dc7e476308a1a0bfbd98dee9d3a15d3e62a4e156c2","generatedAt":"2026-08-30T16:02:22.708Z","publicationDecision":{"recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0","reasons":[]},"claims":[{"id":"urn:maha:claim:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","scope":"The models, apparatus, protocols, datasets, and comparisons reported in Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking.","boundary":"The result remains an estimator under assumptions and is not identical to application-level failure probability.","claimKind":"theoretical-model","sourceIds":["source-magesan-interleaved-rb-2012"],"statement":"The cited method derives bounds on a target gate’s error by comparing interleaved and reference sequence decays.","replication":{"asOfDate":"2026-08-24","assessment":"This candidate records one bounded source package. Independent replications and contradictory measurements must be compiled as separate records before maturity is upgraded.","independentReplicationCount":null},"uncertainty":{"kind":"qualitative","statement":"No platform-independent uncertainty interval exists; numerical values remain attached to the source experiment or model and its stated assumptions."},"evidenceMaturity":"single-study"}],"sources":[{"id":"source-magesan-interleaved-rb-2012","url":"https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505","title":"Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking","rights":{"note":"Maha paraphrases the source-level result and links to the version of record; no article passage is reproduced.","basis":"citation-with-paraphrase","quotationUsed":false},"authors":["Easwar Magesan","Jay M. Gambetta","Joseph Emerson"],"boundary":"The estimate is protocol- and noise-model-dependent and does not replace workload-level or correlated-error characterization.","publisher":"Physical Review Letters, American Physical Society","establishes":"The paper proposes interleaving a target gate with randomized sequences to estimate that gate’s error subject to derived bounds and assumptions.","identifiers":[{"value":"10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505","scheme":"doi"}],"publishedAt":"2012-08-24","exactLocator":"Abstract; interleaved protocol; bounds; numerical analysis."}],"reviewEvents":[{"reviewId":"epireview_974669c5968e429bbec372f1152ba5fb","scope":"source-fidelity","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.229Z","verdict":"approve","supersedesReviewId":null},{"reviewId":"epireview_03551f0dd2f545ada4c3d025b5809c11","scope":"domain-fidelity","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.325Z","verdict":"approve","supersedesReviewId":null},{"reviewId":"epireview_2a8239cf2db84621a20999b1d7febac9","scope":"boundary-adequacy","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.426Z","verdict":"approve","supersedesReviewId":null},{"reviewId":"epireview_659a52e31c5944578dc2ce757b6c17d3","scope":"rights-and-locator","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.529Z","verdict":"approve","supersedesReviewId":null}]},"privacyBoundary":"Operational actor fingerprints, bearer credentials, private reviewer profiles, affiliations, conflicts, and non-consented authority identity fields are excluded."}