[ Insights // public editorial releases ]
Each article here was created through Maha’s evidence-to-editorial workflow, reviewed before release, and published only through an explicit human confirmation. Sources and limits remain on the article itself.
01 · Answer
Start with the decision-relevant conclusion, in plain language.
02 · Evidence
Open the linked sources and supporting artifact; do not take a synthesis on faith.
03 · Limits
Read what the analysis cannot establish before carrying it into a decision.
2 published insights
Evidence-led insight · July 24, 2026
A guide on mapping AI citation failure modes to MPS/0.1 claim tags and using the free MPS Auditor to generate claim-by-claim provenance records before publication.
Editorial review: Mayone Maha Rajan
Read insight ↗Evidence-led insight · July 21, 2026
A practical claim-level review workflow for AI-assisted writing. It separates source attribution from factual verification, records each claim’s evidence status and limitations, and uses the MPS/0.1 Auditor to make unresolved claims visible before publication.
Editorial review: Mayone Maha Rajan
Read insight ↗[ Editorial standard ]
This library does not publish private drafts, rejected candidates, or automated summaries. Each release identifies its reviewer, evidence, method, and limitations so readers can judge the work on its merits.