How can participant vocabulary and analytical vocabulary be used together without either disappearing?
Evidence status
Cites 2 sources, none of which has been read
The sources are named, but none has been retrieved and read as part of building this page. Nothing here has been matched to a passage, so the citations show where a reader might look rather than what was checked.
Rely on this page for
Orientation: how the topic is organised, which terms matter, and where to start reading.
Do not rely on it for
A claim you intend to act on or repeat. Follow the cited material yourself first.
Participant self-description
Insider category
Uses terms meaningful within a community.
Valid claim: Participants use this term with these documented meanings.
Direct answer
How can participant vocabulary and analytical vocabulary be used together without either disappearing?
Mechanism and method
Store both vocabularies.
Declare who applies each term.
Test analytical categories against counterexamples and participant response.
What is measured
Speaker position
Purpose
Translation
Comparison: Insider and outsider categories
Self-description is not automatically population consensus.
Analytical convenience is not indigenous ontology.
Must not be read as: Do not overwrite participant categories or exempt either vocabulary from evidence and ethical scrutiny.
Limitations
Self-description is not automatically population consensus.
Analytical convenience is not indigenous ontology.
What this does not establish
Do not overwrite participant categories or exempt either vocabulary from evidence and ethical scrutiny.