Direct answer
That an electronic signature may not be denied legal effect or admissibility solely for being electronic, and that a qualified electronic signature has the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten one.
Answer contract
Apply the current law lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — Article 25(1) and 25(2) — legal effects of electronic signatures.. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:governance:machine-contracting
implemented-by: urn:maha:property:maha-strategies
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:governance
Questions this page can answer
What does Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS) state about machine-contracting?
That an electronic signature may not be denied legal effect or admissibility solely for being electronic, and that a qualified electronic signature has the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten one.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, Article 25(1) and 25(2) — legal effects of electronic signatures.
What does this source explicitly not establish about machine-contracting?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:governance:machine-contracting implemented-by: urn:maha:property:maha-strategies evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:governance
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.