Direct answer
Research Integrity, in this source register, is limited to the following inspected scope. Reliability, honesty, respect, and accountability frame good research practice and responsibilities. The current PHS rule defines covered research misconduct and requirements for findings and proceedings within its statutory scope. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Source register
Order authorities by role, version, jurisdiction, and freshness rather than treating every link as interchangeable.
A source list is useful only when each source’s scope and boundary remain attached.
Applied scope: Reliability, honesty, respect, and accountability frame good research practice and responsibilities. The current PHS rule defines covered research misconduct and requirements for findings and proceedings within its statutory scope.
Definition and operating context
The canonical concept owner is maha-policy. This route may apply governance; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
This property may publish current-law summaries, policy evidence, Maha proposals labelled as proposals. It must not publish legal advice or proposal presented as enacted law.
Evidence and exact locators
The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity — Section 1, Principles; Sections 2–3. Establishes: Reliability, honesty, respect, and accountability frame good research practice and responsibilities.
Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct — Subpart A scope; §§93.103–93.106; institutional and ORI proceeding subparts. Establishes: The current PHS rule defines covered research misconduct and requirements for findings and proceedings within its statutory scope.
What the evidence does not establish
The code is a self-regulatory European reference and does not decide a specific allegation or create universal law.
The rule is limited to covered PHS-supported activity, excludes honest error and differences of opinion, and is not a universal research-integrity definition or legal advice.
This route must not claim legal advice.
This route must not claim proposal presented as enacted law.
Related definitions and applications
same-topic-application: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/research-integrity/definition
graphEdges: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/tool-governance/definition
same-topic-application: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/research-integrity/mechanisms
same-topic-application: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/research-integrity/uncertainty
property-home: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/
same-topic-application: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/research-integrity/comparison
same-topic-application: https://policy.mahastrategies.com/policy/research-integrity/current-law
Questions this page can answer
What does Research Integrity mean in this bounded context?
Research Integrity, in this source register, is limited to the following inspected scope. Reliability, honesty, respect, and accountability frame good research practice and responsibilities. The current PHS rule defines covered research misconduct and requirements for findings and proceedings within its statutory scope. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Which inspected sources support this sources answer?
The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (revised edition, June 2023), at Section 1, Principles; Sections 2–3, supports reliability, honesty, respect, and accountability frame good research practice and responsibilities. Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93 final rule, 17 September 2024; applicable 1 January 2026), at Subpart A scope; §§93.103–93.106; institutional and ORI proceeding subparts, supports the current PHS rule defines covered research misconduct and requirements for findings and proceedings within its statutory scope.
What does the evidence not establish?
The code is a self-regulatory European reference and does not decide a specific allegation or create universal law. The rule is limited to covered PHS-supported activity, excludes honest error and differences of opinion, and is not a universal research-integrity definition or legal advice. Property boundary: This route may apply governance; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
Which definition or canonical owner must be read first?
This page is the local maha-policy definition for its topic. Related applications may depend on it but may not silently redefine it.
What source, policy, implementation, or release change would require revision?
Re-evaluate this page when a cited source, locator, governing instrument, local implementation, or canonical definition changes. Publication also requires a matching exact-revision review and active canonical release.